Thoughts on Thought

Reptilian brain

We humans have all inherited remnants of the “reptilian brain”, by which I indicate the autonomic/emotional core that is found throughout the animal kingdom. This primitive element of our brain can come under the influence of the rational, cortical brain, yet strong emotions can escape logical control. If they could not, we would probably never fall in love! Continue reading


August 25, 2007 Posted by | Christiane Amanpour, Cognition, creationism, education, evolution, God's Warriors, Neurophilosophy, religion, Science | Leave a comment

God’s Deranged Warriors

He threw away his life and the lives of others in the mistaken belief that he was not throwing away the only life that he will ever have in exchange for nothingness. He, Islamic puritan though he might have claimed to be, expected to be rewarded for his crime with ownership of some mythical number of virgins, presumably without veils etcetera. This is what comes of sexual repression! Muslims might despise American sexual freedom, but their notion of Paradise necessarily includes licence for sexual license. Continue reading

August 25, 2007 Posted by | Christiane Amanpour, fundamentalism, God's Warriors, religion | Leave a comment

Egregious law suits

I sometimes read PZ Myers’ popular blog Pharyngula. PZ is a biologist and an atheist who does not suffer foolishness gladly. Unfortunately his critique of the shoddy science in a book called Lifecode by Pivar has led to a libel suit (pdf).

In this ridiculous suit, “Pivar claims that PZ maliciously called him “a classic crackpot”, with the intent of “holding [Pivar] up to ridicule and embarrassment in this specific area of [Pivar’s] professional endeavors”. The claim also states that this has caused Pivar “considerable mental and emotional distress” as well as financial damages, reparations for which, according to the complaint, should amount to the comically overinflated total reported above.”

How does one determine the parameters for calling someone a classic crackpot? My definition would definitely include someone who fictitionalizes relationships with noted scientists and cooks up pseudoscience, then launches malicious lawsuits because he can afford to.

“The specific area of [Pivar’s] endeavors”? Pivar is a businessman and not a scientists, so how are we to take this book to reflect professional activities? Perhaps the lawyer was thinking of the oldest profession and believed that Pivar was prostituting himself to creationism. Nah! Nobody prostitutes themselves to creationism, do they? It’s probably just lawyer talk to make the law suit sound legitimate.

As to considerable “considerable mental and emotional distress”, my sister is a psychiatrist and told me that in her professional opinion, “anyone who suffers so much distress over being called a “classic crackpot” would be better advised to spend his money on a good therapist rather than a lawyer.”

America is a dismayingly litigious nation, but it is not libel to speak the truth and Myers is a credible expert on developmental biology, so his criticisms are likely valid and the suit is unlikely to succeed. Let’s hope not! As the Friendly Atheist points out, the book’s author, whose science is indeed shoddy, may be following the adage that no publicity is bad publicity.

PZ is wisely remaining silent on the issue.

Sites Elsewhere: The Panda’s Thumb : Scientific American : the Lippard Blog : Overlawyered : Positive Liberty : Science after Sunclipse (timeline)

August 22, 2007 Posted by | biology, creationism, evolution, libel, Pharyngula, Science | Leave a comment

Linking to Blogrolls

Atheist Musings

January 24, 2007 Posted by | Blogroll | Leave a comment